1. Rumor-mongers: These people lack sincerity in their speech. Often driven by psychological imbalance or jealousy, they like to exaggerate or fabricate facts to elevate themselves. Since they have limited strengths of their own, whenever others mention someone else’s merits, they tend to respond in a belittling way.
2. Confusers of right and wrong: They deliberately spread statements that blur the line between right and wrong. Their motives are impure; they try to disrupt other people’s judgment and damage the communication environment.
3. Meddlers in others’ affairs: They are always eager to interfere in other people’s business, especially topics that have nothing to do with them. This kind of behavior easily arouses others’ disgust.

We should recognize that the vast majority of individual bloggers invest limited effort in maintaining their websites and also lack much related knowledge. Among them are students, non-professionals, and people from different regions and professions. They gather in the blogosphere mainly to exchange ideas, share experiences, and create a relaxed and mutually supportive atmosphere.

However, the three types of people mentioned above often undermine this environment and pose an ongoing threat to the maintenance of blogs. Some add fuel to the fire, for example, they keep running speed tests on someone else’s site even when it is under attack, frequently using testing tools—this is very disturbing for bloggers who only want friendly communication. Some are adept at confusing right and wrong, disguising themselves with hypocritical words and playing a ridiculous “middleman” role. Others meddle in everything and deliberately stir up disputes, without caring whether the issue has anything to do with them at all.

Based on these phenomena, I offer the following suggestions for open communities:

1. In community interactions, comments that involve privacy must be prohibited; doxxing, CC attacks, IP leakage, and similar behaviors must be absolutely stamped out;
2. Communicate kindly and express differing opinions rationally;
3. Foster a positive and healthy “circle culture” and promote positive values.